31 January 2001

The Honourable Ralph Klein
Premier of Alberta
307 Legislature Building
Edmonton, AB
T5K 2B6

Dear Premier,

I am writing to you today on two issues.

First, I sent you a letter on 22 December 2000 (a copy of which I have enclosed) which you indicated in your response to me dated 19 January 2001 had been passed on to the Honourable Mike Cardinal for his response. I would like to report that I have not yet had the courtesy of a reply.

Secondly, and more importantly, I would like to comment on your speech to Albertans on 29 January 2001 with respect to the electrical deregulation issue. I found your comments, in my view, to be mainly inaccurate and many times misleading. I say that for the following reasons:

  1. When asked if deregulation was the cause of high electricity prices, your reply was "No" that only 1/6 of the high prices could be related to deregulation. What about the other 5/6? You failed to explain that.
  2. Your comments of the Kyoto Protocol causing uncertainty made some sense, but the protocol was "negotiated" in 1997 with agreement in 1998. This does not explain why no significant new generation has been built in the past 10 years, at least 7 years before Kyoto.
  3. You stated that the high price of natural gas was responsible for the high price of electricity since 40% of the electricity generated in the province is from natural gas. First, natural gas does not supply 40% of the generation (exclusive of cogeneration which is captive to the firms generating it) but less than 25% as per AEUB data. As well, it would be interesting to hear your explanation as to why electricity prices were higher in August 2000 (when natural gas prices were lower) than January 2001when natural gas prices are significantly higher. Additionally, one would only believe that prudent firms would have long term supply contracts for natural gas and would not be involved with spot commodity prices.
  4. You mentioned that two long term plant failures were another reason that has caused electricity prices to be higher. Our understanding is that only Wabamum 4 has been down for an extended period and that plant is rated at 279 megawatts which is about 3.5% of Alberta generating capacity. Which other plant has been down for an extended period of time?
  5. It is impractical for anyone to believe that all electrical generating plants in the province will be running at 100% capacity all of the time. To lose 3.5% of the province's generating capacity should not be a major disaster! Shutdowns will always have to be built into the system.
  6. You stated that new technology will allow for power production from coal as per statements made to you by the generators. We all hope that you are right so that there will be speedy environmental approvals.
  7. You mentioned that there are at least three plants proposed. You did not state their stage of development. It would be our belief that they are only "proposed" announcements, that ground has not been broken and that environmental assessments have not yet been undertaken. For them to be onstream, I would estimate a minimum of four years. Possibly you can prove that I am wrong.
  8. You stated that the pain will be short lived and will be there for the next year and a half to two years. I would suggest that it will be a minimum of five years. Not only will additional capacity be required, inefficient capacity will have to be replaced. Your take on the reasoning for "the next year and a half" would be very interesting.
  9. You stated that the rebate to industrial consumers has been doubled. You failed to mention that the price to industrial consumers has tripled through the deregulation process.
  10. You further stated that: "We have done a lot and perhaps there is more that we can do." Maybe you can define this. How much more will it cost taxpayers? Eventually the money will run out!
  11. You mentioned the possibility of a future referendum on sales tax. Would you be prepared to undertake a referendum on Electrical Deregulation in Alberta?

I found your references to electrical deregulation to be lacking in facts, substance, and detail.

I believe that the costs for Novatel under the Getty regime will look like "petty cash" before the accounting for the current "deregulation fiasco" is completed.

As a concerned citizen of Alberta, I look forward to your speedy response to my concerns.

Yours truly,

R.W. Saari

c.c. The Honourable Dave Hancock, Q.C.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General
M.L.A. Edmonton Whitemud