Recommendations
for Improvements
To Alberta's Electrical Market
as
proposed by the
Industrial Association of Southern Alberta
Objectives
- Maintain stable and competitive pricing while allowing a
deregulated market to operate simultaneously with minimal but
increasing influence on pricing.
- Provide a market structure that encourages new generation
through development of a pricing system which generates the correct
signals to investors.
- Provide a market that operates in a manner that is fair to
generators, retailers and customers and which does not require
government intervention or subsidies.
- Allow opportunities for the deregulated market to mature
and develop by encouraging a forward market so that buyers and
sellers can minimize risk and price uncertainty and which preserves
the Alberta Advantage.
Specific Recommendations:
- Recapture the full
residual value of the generating assets for Albertans who paid
for the generating plants under a regulated environment by canceling
the PPA auction and refunding the proceeds to the bidders.
- The PPA auction was a failure. Treasurer Steve West had predicted
revenues of $4 billion in the spring of 2000. Net proceeds were
$1.1 billion for 4300MW with retail rights for 20 years. By comparison
the M.A.P. auction generated $1 billion in proceeds for 1900
MW for one year (and substantially smaller amounts for years
2 and 3)
- Take back the Power Purchase Arrangements (PPAs) from marketers
by triggering the change of law clause in the PPA agreements.
By taking back PPAs, cost efficient coal and hydro assets are
recaptured for Albertans.
- Honour existing MAP auction contracts with industrial and
commercial customers. Approximately 1,100 megawatts in existing
contracts would be flowed to industrial and commercial customers.
- Provide transition assistance to equitable rates from windfall
royalty revenues for MAP auction customers but cancel plans for
further M.A.P. auctions.
- Ensure lower prices
and stability for all customers by re-instituting legislated
hedges and entitlements for the aggregate provincial baseload
demand as it existed in 1996 so that Albertans receive almost
80% of their electricity at a rate of 5 cents per kwh.
- Implement a system of obligations and entitlements for consumer
groups and by extension, to individual customers in all customer
groups.
- A notice period would be required for customers who wish
to voluntarily leave the grid and take or pay provisions would
apply if the effect of leaving is negative on remaining customers.
- Growth in demand since
1996 will continue to be subject to Power Pool pricing but the
Power Pool rules would be amended to provide a level playing
field.
- The remaining 20% of all consumers bills would be subject
to Power Pool pricing.
- As electrical demand continues to grow, a larger proportion
of customer billings would be subject to Power Pool pricing.
- Amend Power Pool rules to provide for transparency in bidding
and to implement weighted average pricing for consumers.
- The Power Pool would continue to provide incentive for new
generation since all new generation would be subject to Power
Pool pricing.
- Encourage efficiencies
and technological improvements in electrical generation and pass
on those savings to customers in the form of lower prices.
- Increase research and development (R&D) funding for clean
coal technologies, as well as alternative fuel technologies and
renewable energy sources in order to stimulate new generation
supply. (New research shows that new coal technology reduces
CO2 emission by 15% more than with natural gas)
- Maintain a high profile
and aggressive conservation program in conjunction with stakeholders
to reduce peak demand load on the Alberta electricity system.
- Fund consumer education program through a minimal surcharge
on billings
- Develop a consumer education and conservation program to
minimize electrical usage by Albertans during peak price periods.
- Provide incentives to implement time of use billing by encouraging
gradual transition to time of use metering and by providing incentives
for doing so in the rate structure.
- Work in conjunction with utility companies to provide incentives
for consumers to go towards interval metering or time-of-use
metering. Interval or time-of-use metering is a method that measures
energy consumption for consumers in 15-minute intervals. This
will allow customers to manage their consumption more effectively.
Through interval metering, customers can be incented to reduce
their consumption during periods of peak load on the system,
through the offering of preferential rates at off-peak times.
- Create a functioning
competitive retail market where large industrial and commercial
customers can enter into short-term and long-term forward contracts.
- Allow marketers to enter into forward contracts with the
Power Pool so they can sell energy to large commercial and industrial
customers
- Make the Power Pool and the Transmission Administrator a
single entity responsible for the forwards market system.
- Create a climate of
price stability and certainty as a means of attracting significant
new base load supply to Alberta on a priority basis.
- Encourage large scale coal-fired projects
that are more economical than natural gas into today's environment.
Years of identified coal supply is many times that of natural
gas and the price for coal is more stable. Price is also a local
market price.
- Encourage co-generation projects by providing exemptions
from royalties and taxes for fuels used for co-generation.
- Introduce legislation to fast-track the approval process
for new generation before the EUB, with due concern given to
environmental factors. For example, if a project meets certain
criteria for emissions under the Environmental Protection and
Enhancement Act (EPEA), the regulatory compliance burden could
be reduced in order to fast-track projects.
- Explore the possibility of a tie line to the United States
to enhance Alberta's ability to export clean coal and to attract
new investment into the Alberta electricity marketplace.
- Provide Leadership
by investing and sharing the risk in large scale Hydro generation
projects that tend to have longer term paybacks.
- Issue Requests for Proposal (RFP) to potential
investors in large scale new generation with longer term paybacks
and storage capability.
- Use new technology which encourages re-use of water resources.
- Take an equity position to reduce investment risk and to
provide ownership benefits to Albertans.
- Negotiate with B.C. and Manitoba to diversify Alberta's power
supply, through the use of hydro power as a source of electricity
generation in Alberta. and invest in new tie-lines if satisfactory
arrangements can be made to secure long term supply or equity
participation at reasonable prices.
- Make Alberta more "electricity independent" by
reducing our reliance on high-priced spot market power imported
from B.C. Hydro (Powerex) and Saskatchewan Power.
- Protect consumers from
inappropriate use of market power and market behaviour by market
participants.
- Introduce amendments to the Electric Utilities
Act to allow Alberta's Market Surveillance Administrator to prosecute
instances of price gouging by distributors.
- Establish clear criteria for the exercise of market power
and gaming of the Power Pool. Impose strict penalties for the
abuse of market power and manipulation of the Power Pool price.
- Establish an Electricity Ombudsman to ensure that retailers
contracting practices are competitive and fair and in the best
interests of Alberta consumers.
- Implement the recommendations of the October 2000 report
of Alberta's Market Surveillance Administrator by deadline of
June 30, 2001.
- Require that retailers offer contracts of varying duration
-- monthly, winter and summer strips, one year, two years, three
years, four years -- to ensure fair and open competition.
- Level the playing field for existing generators and new generators
as it relates to liability for accidental damages. Existing generators
have no liability. New generators are liable for accidental damage.
New generators will not enter the marketplace without some adjustment
to the liability provisions. Liability should be the same for
all generators when there is gross or willful negligence.
- Establish clear code of conduct rules for the relationship
between an owner of a regulated monopoly service and unregulated
business entities that it owns or is affiliated with, or a provider
of a regulated monopoly service and unregulated business entities
that it owns or is affiliated with, in order to ensure a level
playing field for all market participants.
- Consumers must become
the focus of deregulation. Throughout the process the concerns
of utilities have been addressed, while customers have been ignored.
- deregulation was supposed to be for the
benefit of consumers
- to date consumers have not benefited, but utilities and generators
have
- consumers must be consulted
- recent meetings between the Premier and Epcor and Enmax,
followed by the increase in the regulated rate, demonstrate that
the government is most concerned with the utilities, not consumers
- utilities such as the City of Lethbridge are able to collect
massive profits from electricity, equal to those collected in
a regulated environment, even though they are no longer a retailer
of electricity and will see their revenues decrease substantially
- new players in the market are moving cautiously to protect
themselves, to the detriment of customers
- Demand side response
must be developed.
- demand side response is still nonexistent
- the government has made no apparent effort to create a demand
side response
- the government has, in fact, greatly harmed the situation
by fixing homeowner prices at historic levels, causing homeowners
to be indifferent to pricing and therefore unconcerned about
consumption patterns
- on-line reserves add a large expense and overhead to the
system that should be replaced by interruptible load at a lower
cost
- specify time-of-use meters for ALL new non residential applications
- commit to converting every consumer to time-of-use meters
over the next 5 years
- Supply must be rapidly
increased
- the recent 3.6¢ rebate is actually
a disincentive to build and operate on-site industrial generation,
since the rebate will be foregone for power generated and consumed
internally, and therefore the rebate should be made available
for all consumption whether from the grid or from in-house generation
- fast tracked (under 1 year) new projects for generation should
be subsidized either with government grants, interest free loans,
guaranteed minimum pricing, or by eliminating all municipal and
provincial taxes and fees on fuels used to generate power, or
any combination
- streamline the process for approval of new generation, which
currently requires the approval of 5 government entities, and
establish a standard set of parameters under which small projects
receive automatic, immediate approval
- establish a department to provide support for potential small
generation project developers, helping them to receive regulatory
approval and connecting them with other necessary resources
- provide assistance to stimulate alternate fuel technologies
(e.g. burning wood waste, bio-gas, flare gas, coal) to diversify
away from a dependence on natural gas fired generation
- ensure sufficient supply within Alberta to reduce dependency
on imports
- A level playing field
must be established. Small businesses must be able to participate
in deregulation, both as consumers and potential generators,
without requiring the level of sophistication only available
in large corporations.
- ensure that small and large customers
alike find deregulation easy to deal with
- contracts proposed by retailers can be 50 or more pages long,
and aren't even understood by typical lawyers
- the PPA auction was truly not accessible to small businesses,
nor was the MAP auction, due to their small size and lack of
sophistication
- ensure a wide array of representation from small business
in all future decision processes
- the government should assist small businesses in working
through the maze of such things as becoming a self retailer and
other tasks too onerous for small businesses
- prudential requirements at the pool and by distribution companies
prevent small businesses from becoming self retailers or pool
participants due to their onerous nature and should be waived
- The dysfunctional market
must be repaired. Other than fixing the supply and demand imbalance,
the biggest problem today is that a functional market has not
developed. On October 17th the Power Pool stated that "from
what was originally intended as a temporary framework, we have
amended our rules on a case by case basis." It is time to
build a new framework that has been developed from scratch with
consumers in mind. The Power Pool also stated that "there
are a number of real time market rules which provide generous
flexibility and may accordingly provide the opportunity for market
manipulation." The rules need to be changed to ensure customers
are getting the benefits of deregulation. The government must
ensure that the market is not skewed towards generators, and
is not skewed towards the spot market.
- moving from a regulated monopoly to an
unregulated oligopoly is not of benefit
- very few retailers are active in the province, only 3 are
registered in Lethbridge
- work with retailers and small business customers jointly
to establish why retailers are not offering competitive products
to small businesses, what the needs of small businesses are,
and to work out a solution -- quit simply consulting with Enmax
and Epcor, they are nobody's friends
- the Power Pool MUST immediately move away from the
System Marginal Price and move to a Weighted Average Price,
which would force generators to bid in at the price they really
want, preventing them from copping out and saying that they aren't
responsible for setting prices if they aren't the marginal unit
- the Power Pool MUST begin publishing the names associated
with all hourly supply offers, so that Albertans will know where
to point the finger when prices are unreasonably high
- currently, suppliers have no fear of consumer backlash because
they can hide in anonymity when making supply offers
- suppliers will say that their bids must be secret due to
their competitive nature, but it is a fact that all suppliers
will be on an equally competitive footing as long as ALL names
are published
- the Power Pool MUST establish a system whereby day
ahead, six day ahead, and real time forecasts are accurate, to
allow customers with pool price exposure to manage their operations
other than in real time
- currently, Power Pool forecasts are utterly useless, since
they are frequently out by several hundred percent
- rules must be put in place to ensure suppliers are not able
to game the market to raise prices
- supply offers should be submitted a day in advance and not
be allowed to change thereafter (supply unavailable due to breakdown
can be withdrawn, but is subject to review by the MSA)
- the ability to become a price taker must be removed, thereby
ensuring generators are penalized if they bid too high
- supply from single units should be offered into the pool
in a single block and not divided up to take advantage of a tight
supply situation
- suppliers should be forced out of the spot market and into
the forwards market
- a simple rule such as that no more than 10% of a unit's generation
can be traded in the real time market will help develop active
forwards markets
- forcing suppliers out of the highly speculative, but potentially
lucrative, spot market will help ensure that long term contracts
are available to consumers
- keep the focus on rules that benefit customers, not suppliers